Are You Liquid?
…go hand in hand, there should be a higher return to compensate for the additional risk. Some reasons that make small companies fundamentally riskier than large companies are that they…
…go hand in hand, there should be a higher return to compensate for the additional risk. Some reasons that make small companies fundamentally riskier than large companies are that they…
…billion in assets under management. The fund is still enormous and is at levels about like 2011, but the combination of poor performance, asset outflow and trouble at the top…
…12 months. They published a list of the funds with the largest withdrawals and some of them are pretty remarkable. The Manning & Napier Equity fund had $955 million under…
…good as the Inception fund! Or the GMO Special Opportunities fund, which was up 195.0 percent. I don’t know the answer. My second question was why there was no article…
…back to haunt both Gutfreund and Meriwether in the following years. Gutfreund’s aggressive traders cornered segments of the Treasury bond market by illegally rigging the Treasury’s regular bond auctions. Gutfreund…
…– where a simple index fund beat more than three-quarters of its close competitors. And in no year did it under perform by this kind of margin. The results are…
…the fund. And while the companies are small, they’re often good-sized businesses. The average market capitalization is $785 million and some of the larger holdings include brand name businesses as…
…masses and was the undisputed king of corporate computing at that time. When IBM joined Apple in the personal computing market, Apple said that they were looking forward to responsible…
…groups: cheap, neutral, expensive and ‘N/A.’ That N/A portfolio refers to companies where you can’t compute a ratio because there were no earnings, cash flow, or the company had a…
…I suspect that long fund won’t fare all that well, but it won’t be easy for the short fund either. I also wonder whether Cramer has it in him to…