ā¦aftermath. Iām not calling for a 2001-style tech wreck. Long-time readers, and maybe even short-time readers (is that a phrase?), know I donāt call for drastic action. I want toā¦
ā¦rising, ask yourself what they are really telling you. Iāll bet the headline, āEconomists See 75 Percent Probability of No Recessionā in 12 months just doesnāt see as many adsā¦.
The S&P 500 was up 1.49 percent for the week, which was actually the third straight weekly gain of more than one percent. The continued ramp up in policy supportā¦
ā¦$8 billion and used borrowed money to pay for the rest, also known as leverage, which is interesting because Buffett famously said, āif youāre smart, you donāt need [leverage], andā¦
ā¦ordinary income, or 6 percent, 12.5 percent and 16.5 percent respectively. Hereās an example: if a couple in the top bracket has a $10,000 capital gain, $5,000 would be excludedā¦
ā¦-0.2 percent. Lastly, Iāve included the asset managers, including all the companies Iāve listed above, as well as traditional active managers like T. Rowe Price and Franklin Investments. The pointā¦
ā¦you are taking with each asset class. Traditionally, managers (including us) split the assets by the total dollars in the portfolio: when we say weāre 50/50 stock/bond portfolio, we meanā¦
ā¦stock and āSELL SELL SELLā when he doesnāt, not to mention other odd phrases like, āAre you ready, skee-daddy?ā I donāt like his show, but he is an interesting personalityā¦.
ā¦couldnāt find the answer. Last night, I read that several US companies including Warren Buffettās Berkshire Hathaway and Coca-Cola (where heās only a director) are now going to borrow billionsā¦
ā¦this forum. Last week, I received a question in response to my article, āChance of Recession: 100 percent.ā The reader wanted to know what the recession meant for bonds, especiallyā¦
